Statement of Student Group Presidents on Ahmadinejad's Visit

PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 20, 2007

As is surely common knowledge to everyone by now, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be speaking on campus this Monday, 24 September 2007. We believe that this presents an incredible opportunity for the student body to learn about world affairs and to challenge an influential and controversial figure. In a university setting, no view is too disreputable to be excluded—the goal of a university is to hear and present a wide array of opinions so that they may be challenged and debated in the spirit of free speech and the pursuit of knowledge.

We are disturbed, however, by the extremely short notice given for this event. It should be obvious to anyone that this is an event that will generate a strong reaction from the student body. How can we adequately prepare ourselves in four days for the insightful and productive debate that this event should elicit on campus? How can students who wish to protest successfully organize and plan in four days when demonstrations on campus require a minimum of seven days advance notice for security review? How can students who actually care and want to learn attend the event if registration is closed before the event is even officially announced?

We understand the University’s hesitation to announce the event earlier, since President Ahmadinejad had not accepted the invitation until Wednesday. But, for an event as controversial as this, the needs of the students should take precedence. The student body should have been informed as soon as the invitation had been extended. Even if the invitation had been declined, students would have begun the debate that the event was originally meant to inspire. To keep information like this from the students actively stifles debate.

As President Bollinger said in his Statement yesterday, “Columbia, as a community dedicated to learning and scholarship, is committed to confronting ideas—to understand the world as it is and as it might be. To fulfill this mission we must respect and defend the rights of our schools, our deans, and our faculty to create programming for academic purposes. … We trust our community, including our students, to be fully capable of dealing with these occasions, through the powers of dialogue and reason.” As student leaders we agree with this statement. For this ideal to be recognized, however, we need to allow real student participation. The entire campus community must have the opportunity to actively engage President Ahmadinejad in order to achieve true academic freedom and discussion.

In recent years, criticism surrounding the administration’s handling of major speakers has been prevalent both on and off campus. Let us use this event as an opportunity to improve the process and guarantee student involvement so that we can achieve the high level of academic discourse that this campus deserves.

Paula Cheng is the President of ABC

Niko Cunningham is the President of GSSC

Michelle Diamond is the President of CCSC

Peter Gallota is the President of the Columbia Queer Alliance

John Gardner is Operations Director of Community Impact

Chris Kulawik is the President of the College Republicans

Jacob Kriegel is the President of LIONPAC

Josh Lipsky is the President of the College Democrats

Josh Rosner is the President of Hillel

Nilou Safinya is the President of the Columbia Iranian Students Association

Jonathan Siegel is the Chair of the Student Governing Board

Laura Stoffel is the President of SGA

 

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 2)

Post a Comment

So is it safe to assume that if this were 1937 instead of 2007, Columbia University would be glad to invite the likes of Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin to come and speak "in the spirit of free speech and the pursuit of knowledge?" Universities long ago ceased to teach wisdom, which is different from 'knowledge,' but it is completely disingenuous for Columbia's president to say that "no view is too disreputable to be excluded." This is surely false because we already know that certain views are indeed excluded from the public square on university campuses. It's too bad Columbia doesn't educate their students well enough in history, religion, and philosophy such that they could even begin to 'challenge' a racist, Jew-hater like Amadinejad.

The statement reads:

"In a university setting, no view is too disreputable to be excluded—the goal of a university is to hear and present a wide array of opinions so that they may be challenged and debated in the spirit of free speech and the pursuit of knowledge. "

To bad this statement doesn't apply to the Christian and Conservatives.

Disreputable must have a different meaning at Columbia thatn it does in the rest of the world.

David L. Brown

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots