On Ahmadinejad: A Statement From Campus Leaders

PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 20, 2007

As is surely common knowledge to everyone by now, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be speaking on campus this Monday, Sept. 24. We believe that this presents an incredible opportunity for the student body to learn about world affairs and to challenge an influential and controversial figure. In a university setting, no view is too disreputable to be excluded—the goal of a university is to hear and present a wide array of opinions so that they may be challenged and debated in the spirit of free speech and the pursuit of knowledge.

We are disturbed, however, by the extremely short notice given for this event. It should be obvious to anyone that this is an event that will generate a strong reaction from the student body. How can we adequately prepare ourselves in four days for the insightful and productive debate that this event should elicit on campus? How can students who wish to protest successfully organize and plan in four days when demonstrations on campus require a minimum of seven days advance notice for security review? How can students attend the event if registration is closed before the event is even officially announced?

We understand the University's hesitation to announce the event earlier, since President Ahmadinejad did not accept the invitation until Wednesday. But, for an event as controversial as this, the need for student engagement should take precedence. The student body should have been informed as soon as the invitation was extended. Even if the invitation had been declined, students would have begun the debate that the event was originally meant to inspire. To keep information like this from the students actively stifles productive discussion.

As President Lee Bollinger said in his statement yesterday, "Columbia, as a community dedicated to learning and scholarship, is committed to confronting ideas—to understand the world as it is and as it might be. To fulfill this mission we must respect and defend the rights of our schools, our deans, and our faculty to create programming for academic purposes. ... We trust our community, including our students, to be fully capable of dealing with these occasions, through the powers of dialogue and reason." As student leaders we agree with this statement. For this ideal to be realized, however, we need to allow real student participation. The entire campus community must have the opportunity to actively engage Ahmadinejad in order to achieve true academic freedom and discussion.

In recent years, criticism surrounding the administration's handling of major speakers has been prevalent both on and off campus. Let us use this event as an opportunity to improve the process and guarantee student involvement so that we can achieve the high level of academic discourse that this campus deserves.

Paula Cheng is the president of Activities Board at Columbia. Niko Cunningham is the president of the General Studies Student Council. Michelle Diamond is the president of Columbia College Student Council. Josh Dorsch is the president of the List College Student Council. Peter Gallota is the president of the Columbia Queer Alliance. John Gardner is the operations officer of Community Impact. Chris Kulawik is the president of the College Republicans. Jacob Kriegel is the president of LionPAC. Josh Lipsky is the president of the College Democrats. Josh Rosner is the president of Hillel. Nilou Safinya is the president of the Columbia Iranian Student Association. Jonathan Siegel is the chair of the Student Governing Board. Laura Stoffel is the president of Student Government Association.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 4)

Post a Comment

Zionism is simply the movement for the homeland of the Jewish people in Israel.

Smearing Zionism as extreme Israel nationalism is nonsense. A lie.

How would the racist writer above define "moderate" zionism.

To equate Zionism or the democratic state of Israel with a universally know Terrorist State and its leader is perposterous.
Ajmanijad want to create havoc, destroy Israel, and is probably furnishing arms to Hezbolah and Hamas etc.

What country is being threatened by Israel? answer --none. As far as the Palestinians are concerned--when their leaders stop dancing in the streets when an Israeli is harmed or killed, ; when rockets stop being fired on innocent civilians; when hate mongering (like Nazis)stops being taught to children ; when poor Palestinians stop having 8-10 chcildren in a demographic war... peace will have a chance.

Even the European Union is negative on Hamas.
Ajmadijad represents nothing progressive; nothing peaceful.

You could say the same thing about the Zionist as defined by religious radicals and extreme nationalism.

What is with all of this Hitler talk? Let's look at Nazism: extreme German nationalism and religious radicals who severely persecuted certain minorities.

Let's look at Zionism: extreme Israeli nationalism and religious radicals who severly persecute certain minorities, the native inhabitants of Palestine. Remember that the zionist where terrorist who blew up the King David Hotel killing innocent people. Also, UN Resolution in the 1970s stated that Zionism is racism.

So, maybe Ahmadinejad was right a world without Zionism and other extremist including Islamic extremist would be GOOD! To say otherwise is bigoted towards Muslims and the 'other' Semitic people - the Arabs.

Who was it that said: "ye not judge unless thee be judged thyself"?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots