A Profile of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 21, 2007

Click here to read more and view the feature.
AP Photo.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is currently serving as the sixth president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The highest directly elected official in the country, he is an outspoken critic of the George W. Bush Administration.

Ahmadinejad supports Iran’s nuclear program in spite of the United Nation’s Security Council demanding him to end it. He lost popularity in some places abroad when he called for Israel to be “wiped off the map” and described the Holocaust as a “myth.” In Ahmadinejad’s Iran, being gay is a capital offense, women are legally stoned to death for being raped, and democratic activists are flogged in public squares.

Last year, Ahmadinejad was scheduled to speak on campus, but the invitation was later rescinded after logistical and security questions could not be satifactorily answered.


Quotations from President Bollinger at a meeting with student representatives yesterday:

“Some people accused me and others as having used the timing problem and the … academic context problem as subterfuges for not wanting him to come because of his views and I said that was not correct,”

“The idea [of the World Leaders Forum] is bringing people of power, influence, people who are important in the world—for good or bad—and to make sure that students especially have the opportunity to hear them and interact with them and its’ my belief that we can do for you is through this exposure to help you interact with people of significant power in the world just seeing someone, just listening to someone, hearing the passions, hearing the answers, and wataching and observing them is a significant educational lesson and you, being at Columbia in New York City, especially at the time around the United Nations General Assembly meeting, have the opportunity to see a stream of visitors through that seems almost impossible for any other university to match”

“a year ago I wasn't prepared to stand up and say I strongly disagreed with Jim Gilchrist and the Minutemen and here I am [inaudible] I really want to stand up and say what I think of the views of Ahmadinejad. What's the principle on which I'm making that decision? The principle is that I have to be very careful as president of the university in saying what I think about speakers, and especially speakers that students bring, because when I say things it can have a chilling effect on what students do on the campus, and whatever my views about Jim Gilchrist or whatever my views about [inaudible] these are speakers brought in by student groups and I feel that it's important to respect that process and not speak out denouncing speakers because I'm worried that it would have an inhibiting effect on this very robust debate that we will have on campus where different student groups can bring in different speakers. So I'm very very selective in doing that, and in this case with the president of Iran and...what it means to the institution to have this person here I think it's very important for me to say this. I don't think anybody will be chilled as a result of my saying this. So that's the distinction.

When it comes to speakers on campus invited by students, I will defend a strong principle of openness I mean, virtually any speaker a school invites to come and speak for academic purposes because the school wants to hear and engage with that person, … because I think that we a campus where we are incredibly open to confronting ideas, even very very bad ideas. I recognize that just to have someone come and speak may help that speaker or those ideas. … I think it would be naïve to say there’s never any potential benefite, but I think it’s so far outweighed by the importance of confronting ideas and not shielding ourselves from the world as it is—that that is the value that we have pitched our lives on.

Bollinger began the event by recalling last year’s invitation and why this was “Some people accused me and others as having used the timing problem and the … academic context problem as subterfuges for not wanting him to come because of his views and I said that was not correct,” Bollinger said in recalling last year, when then-dean of SIPA Lisa Anderson asked Bollinger for University support of the event two days before Ahmadinejad was expected to come.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 16)

Post a Comment

I will ask again. Can anyone tell me at least one major contribution that Muslims have made to the world in the last two hundred years? Not just Iran but any Muslim country or person.

I will pose a different question and that is if anyone can tell me at least one time that the the Western world tried not to empower the Muslim world in the last two hundred years? If oil is what is what you need, just ask...dont kill me for it! You first beat me with a stick and then ask why I cannot stand up?

So the intellegensia of Columbia can shout down the protect the borders guy, a polite American. Let's see what they do with a terrorist like Ahmadinejad. My guess is they give him an honorarium and then invite him to a campus sex party.

Well said President Bollinger. It is a shame that the mass cannot understand educated people's logic. That is why the educated people are educated people, I guess. The framers of the Constitution that we look up to were also educated people who did not listen to the mass.

Yes, by all means let him speak, and speak fully from the heart.

And then give him the same justice he gives those who would do the same in his own country.

...and Lee, don't call the house anymore looking for donations because 'we're full up in here with crazy and we don't want anymore'.

Assholes.

Perhaps someone could ask Mahmoud to list all the major advances that Muslims have made to civilization over the last 200 years. I can't think of any but maybe Mahmoud can list them. Explosive belts and shoe bombs dont count by the way.

Do you know how long is our country's history? Or from who we had got our science?

Go study some more to find out that what we should even pay to the Muslims.
We should ask these questions from President Bush.

All you needed was an anti-Semitic's invitation to bring out your anti-Islamic beliefs. Why only 200 years? Because that's the only time the U.S. has emerged as a world leader? Are you so arrogant that you can't look beyond U.S. history? If you must know, the numbers you use today (1, 2, 3...) are Arabic numerals, that's right, not Roman. You would not have engineering, architecture, MIT and NASA today without Arabic numerals. You should not even be able to count your money without the Muslim civilization donating their numbers to you.

Good for Columbia! The best way to solve the quagmire in Iraq is to never engage Iraq's neighbors. If you ignore people you dislike, problems go away, the Surge starts working, and Jesus comes down from heaven with free ice cream. Allah Akbar!

its funny that a school like Columbia will allow a terrorist to speak, but they cause trouble when someone is there to hold a meeting on the problem of illegal immigration. wake up people.

There should be no way in hell that people at Columbia, either students, faculty or alum should be silent on this issue. This man and his government are supplying IED's to the terrorists in Iraq that are killing US soldiers every damn day.... are you okay knowing this??? are you comfortable having a man like this on your campus?????

Well I maybe not an alumnus,but could someone provide the public with a link to view this event?This is something that everyone should see and hear at this point and time.I have watcd other statespersons speak live via the internet from other universities.Please post a reply for the general public on this publication's front page,thank you!

Yeah, let the terrorist speak. Who cares if he wants Israel wiped off the Earth? Who cares if his regime sponsors terrorism? Who cares if the Iranian regime sends fighters and bombs into Iraq to kill our troops?

Idiots.

As a conservative republican alumni, I would say this.
Let the man speak, then shame on Columbia students and faculty if they cannot through interview and debate expose him for what he is: A power hungry opportunist that would kill thousands of innocents to foister his religous views upon the world. Columbians seem all too willing to shout down those who they clearly disagree with on domestic politics. Now you could actually use some of your political vigor to a good use.
Demonstrate to the world that you actually are as smart as you think that you are.
Anonymous, School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1983

You are an ALUMNUS, not an alumni! Geesh!

Pardon me for my mistake, I hadn't practiced my latin in 30 years, and had other things on my mind. Pseudo intellects like yourself always need to find the smallest and irrelevant things wrong with a commentary rather than to address the main point, which is that Columbia has positioned itself poorly in this issue.
I fully expect a bunch of leftist puff ball questions to be given to this man, the President of who has called for the nuclear annihilation of Israel and is involved militarily against US forces in Iraq.
Go ahead, look like fools.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots
-->