Questions, comments or a tip? Let us know.
Protests Straddle Gates as Thousands Turn Out to Watch Speech on South Lawn
As a war of words carried on in Roone Arledge Auditorium on Monday, factions of pro-Israel and anti-war activists shouted across barricades on a block-long stretch of Broadway.
On campus, the mood was more reflective, with student groups taking turns presenting their takes on Columbia’s controversial invitation to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a speak-out organized by the ad hoc Columbia Coalition. During the speech, the crowd on the South Lawn far outnumbered that on the streets, as thousands of students crowded around a giant-screen video truck to watch Ahmadinejad’s speech.
While the Columbia Coalition was nominally apolitical, demonstrators appeared to be mostly divided into two camps. There was a pervading pro-Israel sentiment as members of the Columbia/Barnard Hillel sang and danced on Low Plaza, clad in specially-ordered black T-shirts. The other major presence was a large contingent of anti-war protesters.
The off-campus protest was much smaller than the 10,000 people predicted by administrators, but the protesters compensated for it by being loud and boisterous. Several dozen New York Police Department officers stood guard around a barricaded crowd concentrated at the intersection of Broadway and 116th Street. NYPD estimates of the actual crowd came in at under 1,000. The police did not close Broadway, as had been expected, but corralled the crowd behind metal barricades on Broadway’s outermost lanes and closed off sidewalks for a block in each direction from Lerner Hall.
Students across campus skipped classes or made time between them to watch speakers from campus groups comment on President Ahmadinejad’s presence on campus and the policies of the Iranian government. A hush fell when the big screen came to life, beaming the speeches in Roone Arledge to students on the South Lawn. According to Rosemary Keane, assistant vice president for Student and Administrative Services, between two and three thousand students and faculty assembled to watch.
Viewers cheered the image of John Coatsworth, acting dean of the School of International and Public Affairs, and one spectator on the lawn raised an Iranian flag. When University President Lee Bollinger appeared, the crowd hollered its support, and his comments addressing free speech drew warm cheers.
Earlier in the day, Iranian flags dominated the small knot of protesters outside the Broadway gates. Numbers and tempers swelled with busloads of pro-Israel demonstrators who arrived later in the afternoon.
In halting English, Iranian immigrant Jamshid Sayas said he did not oppose the University’s asking Ahmadinejad to speak but wanted it to be clear that the president did not speak for all Iranians. “Politics should be separate from religion,” he said. “We don’t need a Muslim fanatic for Iran.”
Pro-Israel protesters screamed at Holocaust deniers, and a small crowd gathered around a woman holding a sign supporting Bollinger’s decision to host the Iranian president, jabbing their fingers at her while shouting “Nazi” and “Shame.” Discussion deteriorated, and screamed arguments broke out on corners up and down the barricaded blocks of Broadway.
Pro-Israel supporters also vented their anger at an Iranian-American City College student holding a sign reading “American-Iranian Friendship Committee.”
“Where’s your burka?,” a woman screamed over and over again.
“I think you’re showing a little too much skin,” another man yelled. “If you were dressed like that in Iran, you would be raped.”
CUNY architecture student Mahdi Hosseinzadeh held photographs of his imprisoned friends and said that he had taken a class taught by Ahmadinejad while a student at Iran University of Science and Technology. Although he described the president as a “good teacher,” he said that he objected to his policy of imprisoning political dissidents.
“My friends are in President Ahmadinejad’s prison,” he said. “They are imprisoned for being part of an Iranian student movement. When Ahmadinejad took them first, they put them in jail for no reason—then they come up with political reasons.”
The largest group of off-campus demonstrators came to protest Ahmadinejad’s past threats against Israel, including a large group from the Zionist Organization of America. Many said that by giving Ahmadinejad a platform, Columbia was giving credibility to hate speech.
“Free speech does not include hate,” Yeshiva University student Eric Israeli said. “For a university that claims it’s neutral—that it doesn’t follow one political party or one theology—it’s completely off the mark” to host Ahmadinejad.
Holocaust survivor Lyubov Bistreff, 77, said she came to protest against Ahmadinejad’s revision of history. “He cannot deny it [the Holocaust] because I am a witness ... I remember everything. Why does he deny this? This is history, this is history.”
Maria Insalaco, Joy Resmovits, Ivette Sanchez, and Lydia Wileder contributed to this article.
The authors of this article can be reached at news@columbiaspectator.com.
Article Tools:
View Comments ( 4)
Post a Comment
-->
















Antiwar Protesters Decry Handling of Iran
By Michael E. Ruane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 26, 2007; A11
A group of antiwar protesters demonstrated outside the
White House yesterday to condemn what they termed the
government's "demonization" of Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and said they think the Bush
administration is preparing the public for an attack
on Iran.
The 25 protesters, most of them from the Troops Out
Now Coalition, walked in a circle on the sidewalk
north of the White House, chanting "Get out of Iraq!
Stay out of Iran!" and holding signs that read: "Don't
Terrorize Iran" and "Don't Appease Israel."
They dismissed the criticisms this week of the Iranian
president, saying the United States had criticized
Saddam Hussein before invading Iraq.
"There's a hysteria in the media emanating from New
York . . . against the president of Iran," coalition
spokesman Larry Holmes said. "We're here in response
to what's been going on in New York: the Columbia
debate, the front pages of the tabloids, the
electronic media, demonizing the president. And we
know what it's about.
"We know that the government is in very advanced
stages of planning for a war in Iran. They've got a
naval armada" in the Persian Gulf, he said. "The
Pentagon's got its plans. And now we see the
psychological preparation."
The Iranian president has been criticized this week
for questioning the Holocaust and saying there are no
homosexuals in Iran.
Referring to Ahmadinejad's controversial statements,
Holmes said: "I don't think it's relevant. I think
that's an interesting philosophical discussion about
theology, about social views, that you have over
coffee."
Yesterday's protest is part of week-long antiwar rally
that will culminate Saturday in a march scheduled to
begin at noon from a coalition camp on the west side
of the U.S. Capitol.
Spokesmen said the events are aimed mainly at stopping
the war in Iraq and what they called injustice at
home. The march route was being worked out, organizers
said. The National Park Service said the group's
permit suggests that between 2,000 and 5,000 marchers
are expected.
"The focus here is stop the war at home and abroad,"
coalition spokesman Dustin Langley said Monday. "We
think there's a real connection between the fact that
they're spending $750 million a day on the war and
people here die because they don't have access to
health care."
The march comes after a large antiwar protest Sept. 15
and precedes an antiwar, anti-global warming rally
scheduled for next month. The coalition says there
have been numerous marches because the war has not
ended and because antiwar groups might have different
targets.
"Repeated protests are even more important than
whether we get half a million people out here,"
Langley said. "It may just be important to be here and
just dog them because they're lying to us."
Its funny how we Americans can be so painfully ignorant. Our government supported Saddam Hussein while he was killing thousands in the 80s, we placed a Dictator on top of the Iranian people (the Shah) who also killed many innocent civilians, we give our support to real dictatorships like those in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, and we have also proppped up rascist regimes like Israel and Apartheid South Africa. In Iraq, our presence has lead to the deaths of almost 1 million people. Why all this venom then toward the President of Iran? They have done nothing even remotely close to the atrocities that our own government has committed since our inception in the days of slavery and colonial genocide. Ahmadinejad's only point in terms of the holocaust is that freedom of speech is not true in the west. People can be jailed in Europe simply for saying that the numbers involved in the holocaust have been inflated, which they have been in order to be used as a propoganda tool for the Zionist agenda. But at any rate, the holocaust was committed by white Christian westerners, and not by Muslim Middle Easterners. So the point which follows is why do many western people these days now use the Holocaust to justify the colonization of Palestine? These days the holocaust is used as a tool for oppression of others, which is a travesty for any and all who lost their lives to the Nazis.
You are wrong. We did not have slavery in America. "I do not know who told you that." Are you part of the Qudsonist Agenda that is secretly controlling the world?
While most Jews (and most Americans) are "Pro Israel", the "Pro Israel" tag should nominally apply to those protesting the wiping of Israel off the map (I would have hoped that everyone would be against that who was gathered to protest). The Jewish (perhaps) anti-racist tag should apply to those protesting Ahmadinejad's lies about the murder of millions of Jews. What banner was Ms. Bistreff standing under? Is she Pro-Israel or Anti-Holocaust? I am also not sure why "Pro Israel" activists are shown as squaring off against "Anti-War" activists. Are the "Anti-War" activists also denying the Holocaust and supporting the genocidal talk of Ahmadinejad? Are the "Anti-War" activists against a war with Iraq or Iran, but "Pro War" for a nuclear war by Iran against Israel or the US? How about the Iranian government's official policy of hanging gays? Which side are the "Anti-War" activists on? And why are you assuming, without quotes above, that the "Pro Israel" side is also "Pro War" in Iraq?
Harris Fenton
Post new comment