Questions, comments or a tip? Let us know.
Tajbakhsh’s Freedom
What was lost in the debate surrounding Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to Columbia is one of the most important reasons for the University to celebrate. On the same day the invitation to Ahmadinejad was announced, Kian Tajbakhsh, who received his Ph.D. at Columbia, was freed from the Iranian prison that he had been held in since May. Tajbakhsh, an urban planner and adviser to the Open Society Institute, was one of several Iranian-Americans arrested in Iran in recent months—none of whom were charged with specific crimes. Iranian prisons are notoriously unjust and are often used as tools to silence political dissidents. In the absence of a proper legal system, it can take years to release a prisoner, especially one held simply for being an American citizen. While there is no direct causal link between the University’s invitation to the Iranian president and Tajbakhsh’s release, calls for his release from both President Lee Bollinger and Dean John Coatsworth kept the issue from disappearing from the public eye.
Tajbakhsh’s freedom would be reason enough for the University to celebrate. But in his introduction to the Iranian president, President Bollinger called on Ahmadinejad to allow Tajbakhsh to leave Tehran, where he is under house arrest, and offered the alumnus a position next semester as an adjunct professor in the School of Urban Planning. With the platform Bollinger had, he made Tajbakhsh’s return to the United States a national issue.
Whether or not one agrees with the political implications of inviting Ahmadinejad to speak at Columbia, the event was an excellent platform to address this essential issue. The Iranian leader’s talk may not have had the global impact that Bollinger had hoped for; it may not have answered the questions people wanted answered. But it drew international attention to the plight of Tajbakhsh and other academics who are unjustly imprisioned. If this is all Bollinger’s opening statement accomplished, then it can be considered a success.
Article Tools:
View Comments ( 5)
Post a Comment
-->
















I first viewed the invitation of the Iranian President with horror. But in light of President Bollinger's introduction and events that you report now, Bollinger actions were stupendous. The President of Columbia is a great, compassionate leader. A Natioal treasure!
How is this not a tacit admission that Columbia yielded to hostage extortion?
Is there some reason to believe Ahmadinejad will allow Columbia's journalist-hostage to leave Iran?
In what sense is this grotesque quid pro quo a reason to celebrate?
Columbia needs to get a new Preident.This one makes the school look bad.
He invites the Iranian President to speak and then insults him.
He does not show any manners.Nor does he show him any respect.
He was glad to get him to come just to get the free publicity.Instead,his shameful behaviour reflects badly on the school.
Pres. George Bush spoke better than he did.
What an ignoramus.Sign up for "Manners " training 101
Robert G. Mac Donald.B.A.M.D. Saint-Sauveur,Qc
All I can saw is that I'm so glad Kian has so many friends at Columbia, Amnesty International, and elsewhere working toward his freedom. As his friend and a former urban planning professor myself I know of his dedication to scholarship and justice. Thank you all.
Post new comment