Free Speech in an Academic Setting

PUBLISHED OCTOBER 15, 2007

In the days preceding and following Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's visit to Columbia's campus, numerous faculty members, student groups, and administrators have spoken out; some to commend, some to criticize, and some merely to comment.

After the speaking engagement was publicized, the Law School Student Senate, of which we are members, met to discuss what Senate reaction, if any, was appropriate. Obviously, in a group comprising over 50 members, a variety of differing and conflicting views were expressed. Ultimately, the elected student representative body of the Law School declined to issue any sort of positional statement regarding the event. Perceiving a lack of consensus within ourselves, and certainly within the law school, we concluded that it would be inappropriate for us to issue a positional statement on behalf of the entire student body. Rather than impose our own views on others, we sought to encourage the diversity of thoughts and opinions that makes the law school community so valuable.

We therefore decided to craft a response, which would draw on the unique resources available at the law school, to promote dialogue and debate in a respectful, yet thought-provoking forum. We have organized a panel discussion with members of the law faculty who are leading scholars on first amendment issues, to examine what limits, if any, there are or should be to free speech in an academic setting. This panel will explore the key concepts underlying the first amendment, question what bearing federal law should have on University policy, and scrutinize the interplay between protected speech and hate crimes.

The incidents of vandalism and hatred that have tarnished this campus in the past few weeks only underscore the importance of this discussion. While these events did not occur on the law school campus itself, we nonetheless feel and express our solidarity with the larger University community. Further, as students and professors of the law, we feel a special obligation to help others, to the extent that we can, explore and question the legal issues that underlie this debate. To be meaningful, debate must be informed. Our panel seeks to make present and future debate meaningful by arming students with knowledge of the legal framework and perspectives underlying free speech on our campus.

The "Free Speech in an Academic Setting" panel will take place on Tuesday, October 16th, in Jerome Greene Hall (corner of 116th and Amsterdam), Room 106, at 6:00 PM. The authors are students in the Law Schol and members of the Law School Student Senate.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 7)

Post a Comment

I think the academic setting of a college is certainly conducive to educational exchanges about topics such as this. Moreover, i feel in my personal opinion, as a college senior and student senator at my college ,that it is a responsibility of the student leaders to create a vehicle (such as a forum) by which a higher level of discourse can take place.Finally, i also would like to say that if we can talk about issues then how can we come to sustentative conclusions.

Sorry i cant make this event because i live far away but if anything changes i will be there.

My name is Greg Gershowitz and i posted the above comment. Im not sure why it didnt say so.

Also i made an error i used the word *can* and i intended to say *cant*

Sorry, I have better things to do than show up for your PC Moonbat "event." I might lose my dinner. And, "my pair" are doing fine, thank you for your concern.

Wow. I never knew I could find such good humor writing in the Spectator. HilARious.

In all seriousness - if you think this is just the party line or the comparisons drawn are terrible, grow a pair, come to the event, and speak your mind. If we're a free speech campus, let's have some free speech. See you at 6.

Really. Political Correctness has rotted their brains. They're like zombies wandering around with glazed eyes and outstretched arms droning "diversity - diversity - diversity - hatred - hatred - hatred." The sum total of their PC vocabularies! Man, you people are ill.

If you'd written something more interesting than the Party Line, perhaps you would have received some comments. You people are 'bots.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots