Horowitz Assails Academic Climate

PUBLISHED OCTOBER 26, 2007

In his appearance at Columbia Friday afternoon, David Horowitz, CC ’59, addressed the war on terror, education at Columbia, and women's rights in predominantly Muslim countries.

Horowitz’s speech, organized by the College Republicans, was the culmination of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, a controversial lecture tour spanning 114 U.S. college campuses. Public Safety guards flanked the doors of the CUID-only event and instituted a baggage check, as Horowitz spoke to an audience that filled about two-thirds of Lerner Cinema. The crowd was enthusiastic, though some potential dissenters were absent, opting for protests held at the same time.

Horowitz took shots at Columbia, liberals, and critics of the term "Islamo-Fascist."

“When I came to this campus as a freshman 52 years ago … the gates and the atmosphere was a lot more hospitable to actual thinking than it is today,” Horowitz said. A conservative writer, Horowitz said he was a Marxist as an undergraduate in a place where most professors were not.

“In those days … I never heard a professor express a political opinion in the classroom one time,” he said, adding that, “nooses have been put figuratively on the doors of the College Republicans.”

Horowitz clarified the term Islamo-Fascism, saying he intended the week to be a defense of moderate Muslims. He said Algerian Muslims first coined the term as “Islamo-Fascist” organizations slaughtered them in the 1990s. According to Horowitz, Nazism encouraged the development of modern Islamo-Fascism. But many have countered that Horowitz exploits the term to pursue his own agenda.

The speech generated a mostly positive response from the audience. As Horowitz spoke, many of his more vocal critics, including the College Democrats, attended a panel of four Columbia professors who discussed the dangers of Horowitz’s ideas.

To the democrats at Columbia, Horowitz said, “You are getting a worse education than the conservatives,” because conservatives “are all challenged all the time.” He said that education at Columbia is one-sided, citing as an example that the Womens’ Studies department does not deal with the oppression of women in Muslim countries.

“There are a hundred and thirty million girls in the Islamic world who have had their genitals sliced off because according to a perverse interpretation of Islamic tradition, female sexual pleasure is evil, so this is to deprive them of pleasure in the sexual act.” Horowitz said that people mistakenly blame President George W. Bush for the Iraq War. "The identification of America as a great Satan did not come during the administration of George Bush," Horowitz said. "The first crowds in the Muslim world chanting a million strong—a million Muslims in a capital city chanting 'death to america,' that's you, it's everyone here, did not come during the administration of George Bush. It came during the administration of Jimmy Carter."

According to Horowitz, when previous President Jimmy Carter supported the 1979 Iranian revolution by releasing Ayatollah Khomeini’s cohorts from jail, he “pulled the rug from under the Shah,” who liberated women in Iran by offering them education.

The event avoided the abrupt but non-violent ending of Horowitz’s appearance at Emory University yesterday, during which a boisterous audience prompted police to escort Horowitz off the stage mid-way through his speech. Audience members submitted questions on index cards, which Chris Kulawik, CC ’08 and College Republicans president, sifted through and presented. Horowitz cut off Kulawik before he finished reading some questions. The audience met many of Horowitz’s points with enthusiastic clapping.

When Kulawik read a question inquiring about “American Fascism,” Horowitz dismissed the question by saying “people who think there’s an American fascism are delusional.”

Joy Resmovits can be reached at joy.resmovits@columbiaspectator.com.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 22)

Post a Comment

Agreed that this is a land that values freedom. But the founding fathers never intended it to be a haven for guys who don’t love it but still love the land they or their forefathers left for good.

If anybody still love the land they came from and still cannot forget their native pet biases, prejudices and animosities, they should go back and join the respective armies and fight it out. Rather than cowardly hiding in the safety of this land. Enough is enough.

This country also deserves a gratitude and loyalty rather than baby boomer culture shocks and towering infernos which inflicted to achieve foreign ends. Nor can it be a Tower of Babel.

I am surprised at the level of illiteracy amongst Columbia students when it comes to the feedback in this section. Granted, Horowitz is creating more heat than light, but the comments here are "like duh?" Boy, am I glad I went to NYU and not Columbia.

Illiteracy? We save our grammatic intelligence for the classroom rather than the comment's section at the Columbia Spec. website that you (NYU student) come to in order to prove your intelligence. You are bitter you didn't get in here or you wish you went here, that's why you come and write on our online newspaper. Our events are newsworthy, definitely, so you are here. Thought about how many times we have to go to NYU to see what newsworthy thing they are doing today?

Boy, we're glad you did too.

Funny he should say that conservatives are "challenged all the time"...if they are challenged, it is because they hold a world view that is so narrow and regressive that others try to open their mind to other possibilities. All in vain, however.

I have conservative friends, and although I they are basically good people their minds are absolutely closed to any idea that does not fit with the conservative talking points of the day.

The best thing to do about Horowitz is to ignore him. He is neither encouraging nor participating in civilized dialogue. This ridiculous coinage "Islamofascism" only makes me want to ask about whether we might also discuss "Christofacism" "Druidofascism" "Judeofascism" and "Zoroastrofascism" Tying the name of a lousy political idea together with a name of some religion doesn't really help clarify anything at all, and does not create a useful concept.

One wonders whether Horowitz has somehow compromised the total number of brain cells he has remaining available for coherent thought. Some quiet time with no publicity might be helpful to his ability to focus and think clearly.

Idiotarian @ 1:12am muttered "..."Islamofascism" only makes me want to ask about whether we might also discuss "Christofacism" "Druidofascism" "Judeofascism" and "Zoroastrofascism"...

Indeed "we might". There's a good historical case to study (as many academics have) Nazism's "Druido-Fascist" character. As a malignant global phenomenon, it's pretty much a fringe movement today. Dustbin.

If you want a better religio-fascist analog for Islamo-Fascism, look no further than FDR's Shinto-fascists. Sure, there were a good number of moderate Shinto (some serving in US armed forces) during WWII; but that didn't stop the greatest generation from recognizing a fascist enemy who beheaded infidels, mass murdered, suicide bombed (kamikaze), enslaved non-Shinto, etc. ad nauseum.

But kindly don't bore folks w/ specious assertions of Christian-fascism. You'll need to cite examples other than IRA, ETA, FMLN, etc. ad nauseum-- those are atheistic Marxist-Fascist (not Christian) movements (as their terrorist manifestos plainly assert).

And folks are mighty tired of the Left's obscene Zionism = Fascism neologism. Juxtaposed to the Apartheid Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran, etc., Israel's voting Muslim citizens are part of a beacon of freedom in a sea of Islamo-fascist tyrannies.

Bottom line: Wacademia can pretend Islamo-fascism doesn't exist... but 9000+ Jihadist attacks since 9/11 don't lie.

Nothing happened because the event was closed. Emory would have looked like small potatoes had it been open to everyone without RSVP. The upshot was the college republicans did a better job keeping people out than the protests!

Oh puhleeezzeee, these are utterly ridiculous, baseless opinions. I am a moderate, no, liberal Muslim and not "Islamo-fascism Awareness Week" is not helping me very much against radical Muslims. What are you saying that there are the moderate and liberal and then there are the radical? Whatever happened to the religious?

And P.S. oppression of women in the Middle East is all we even talk about when studying oppression in women's studies, people stereotypically think of the Muslim world as the first place when they think of male-female inequality. So don't say that our classes don't talk about it. You are not informed, how would you be? You graduated and left half-a-century ago.

Women's circumcision is not a Islamic belief, it is cultural and done in many Jewish communities too, for both communities, it is a bad practice, we give you that. But why only bring up the Muslim community practicing this? Is there are mission here?

Carter got the Noble Prize. We don't need to hear from a neo-conservative man who holds opinions against Muslim Students' Associations, women and blacks what he did right or wrong. He is a good man, don't drag him into your meaningless rants.

Did you realize I am a democrat? I am getting a very good education here, and I don't need to justify that opinion because you basically never do.

He said that education at Columbia is one-sided, citing as an example that the Womens’ Studies department does not deal with the oppression of women in Muslim countries.

somehow i have a hard time believing that there isn't a single course at columbia that at least spends some time exploring the oppression of women in muslim countries. or maybe he's just arguing that it doesn't exist in the women's studies department, which is a pretty pointless argument if it exists elsewhere.

Huh???

Jimmy Carter dismatled the CIA blinding the US to the state of Iran or the rest of the world. Proof? Jimma called Iran "an island of stability" in a visit mere months before the radicals now running the country grabbed power.

And, Christians and Jews don't worship "One God" with Muslims. Allah is the name of the moon god of the middle eastern tribes of Arabia. They merely co-oped that god for their current religion.

Lol, you should read the history of these religions. They have the same religions and ideals that describe, essentially, the same God. Allah might have been a different Arabic word, but we certainly do not see him or her as the moon god. You are mistaken there. My God is the same God that Jews and Christians worship, so I basically worship with them.

LOL you are TOTALLY uninformed. You are mistaken.
Allah isn't God, much less the God of all different people. Allah was a rock idol in Mecca--one of several hundred. Allah wasn't even Muhammad's first god--that was Ar-Rahman--the Hanif rock idol. The character attributed to Allah by Muhammad in the Qur'an is a perfect match for the character attributed to Muhammad in the Hadith. In other words, Muhammad made Allah in his own image. And that image is evil. The character attributed to Allah in the Qur'an is a perfect match for the character attributed to Satan in the Bible. Muhammad was accused countless times of being demon possessed. Several times he even admitted to being possessed. You care to explain that??

Muslims would have us believe that "Allah" is a contraction of "al" and "ilah." But the first pillar of Islam contradicts this claim when it says: "There is no ilah but Allah." If "Allah" were the Arabic word for god it would have been written: "There is no allah but Allah. Moreover, the Qur'an itself uses "Ilah" when Allah claims to be "the God of Abraham" (Qur'an 2:132). And that ends the debate because the only way Muslims can claim Allah, not Ilah, is the Arabic word for "God" is for the Qur'an to be errant or for its author to be either ignorant or deceitful.
So which is it ??
Your own scriptures profess that Allah had an ignominious rule as a Meccan rock idol centuries before he was transformed from god to God, from an ilah to Allah. All of which serves to destroy the most essential Islamic myth: "We all worship the same God."

Please refrain from teaching me my own religion. I know it and its history well enough. Academic scholars also attest to Islamic history. The Muslim God has not one but 99 names. Allah is one of them. Now if you want to trace an Arabic word back and look at it from an archeologist's point of view, you will see that it was brought from a pre-existing word, but it does not stand for a pre-existing god in the Islamic faith.

I don't know what kind of books you have been reading, clearly they are looking to degrade the faith, if this was done against any other religion or religion related conflict, you would have flared up. But because it is Islam, you choose to support it. Someday, you will realize your mistake.

I agree. The etymology of "Allah" has no bearing on this discussion. The current use of Allah is "the one true God". My wife's family are Lebanese Christians of several churches Catholic, Orthodox and Assyrian. They all call God the Father "Allah" when speaking their native tongue.

R.

So that proves my point, my God is the Allah and it is the same for Catholic, Orthodox and Assyrians. Allah currently is the one true God, and that stands for people of all Abraham-ic faiths in my religion.

*yawn*

Christians and Jews are well aware that the name "Allah" is used by Arab-speaking Christians for the God of the Bible. In fact, the root from which the name is derived, ilah, stems from the ancient Semitic languages, corresponding to the Mesopotamian IL, as well as the Hebrew-Aramaic EL, as in El-ohim, El-shaddai, Isra-el. These terms were often used in ancient Semitic languages to refer to any deity worshiped as a high god, especially the chief deity amongst a pantheon of lesser gods. As such, the Holy Bible uses the term El as just one of the many titles for Yahweh, the only one true God.

Yet the problem arises from the fact that Muslims insist that Allah is not a title, but the personal name of the God of Islam. This becomes problematic since according to the Holy Bible the name of the God of Abraham is Yahweh/Jehovah, not Allah:

God spoke further to Moses and said to him, "I am Yahweh (YHVH) and I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as God Almighty; but by my name, Yahweh, I did not make myself known to them."
[Exodus 6:2-3]

Therefore, Christians can use Allah as a title but not as the personal name for the God of the Bible.

Nevertheless, the term's etymology is a distraction which does not speak to the relevant issue: The Quran alleges that the God of Islam, Allah, is indeed the God of Abraham and hence the God of Scripture, Yahweh/El-ohim/El-Shadai. But is this the case? IS ALLAH THE GOD OF BIBLE?

The evidence says, no.

I was at the event today, and there are some erros in this article. First, Horowitz did not say that Jimmy Carter started the war in Iraq. Horowtiz said that the situation in Iran, which is ruled according to many by Islamo-Fascicsts is Jimmy Carter's fault. This is a view held by many. Additionally, Howrowitz never dismissed any questions as the article claims. The qriter clearly has her own personal agenda.

I don't get it...how did Jimmy Carter start the Iraq War??? Or are those two ideas just poorly juxtaposed in the article?

Seeing how we set up the Shah in place of the democratically elected Mossadegh in 1956, we can hardly blame Carter

If the event was supposed to support Moderate Muslims, why doesn't isn't the title: "We Worship One God Together Awareness Week"

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots