Community Impact Awarded $20,000

PUBLISHED OCTOBER 31, 2007

Provost Alan Brinkley has awarded Community Impact $20,000 to be used for service learning fellowships for students.

Community Impact, whose leaders had voiced concerns about cuts made to their budget in this year’s club allocations, said it hopes use the windfall to compensate for underfunded areas within the board. CI held a town hall Tuesday night at which committee executives gathered feedback on how best to distribute the new grant.

“The Provost has been a strong supporter of CI for some time, as has Chaplain Jewelnel Davis who also works with the Executive Director. The proposal for additional support was strong, well-prepared and described a way in which additional resources could have an expanded impact,” wrote vice provost Roxie Smith in a statement.

At the town hall, program coordinators gathered in groups to discuss various ways to allocate the money to students. “The purpose [of the town hall] was to make sure we were going to do this with participation and communication,” Allie Feldberg, CC ’08 and one of Community Impact’s student executives, explained.

Some of the discussion surrounded how to divide the sum, while other students discussed whether or not projects funded by the fellowships should be limited to within the New York City area or be expanded to projects abroad. Students considered ways to advertise the fellowships to make them more accessible and gathered inspiration by looking at other universities’ fellowships.

Community Impact receives a fourth of its $1 million budget from the University, with the rest coming from fund-raising and other efforts. As of last February, Community Impact recognizes 25 groups and has faced difficulty in adding more from lack of funds and resources.

“Community Impact is in perpetual financial crisis,” Sakib Khan, CC ’07, last year’s Student Governing Board chair, said last semester.

After the council-run Funding At Columbia University board decreased its allocation to Community Impact by 12 percent, six members of CI’s Student Executive Committee submitted two proposals to Brinkley in early May hoping to get funds. The first was an expansive proposal about CI’s relationship to the Columbia community. The second was a more detailed proposal about providing service learning fellowships to Columbia students.

The board hopes that the fellowships will provide valuable public service experiences to students.

CI’s student executives expressed their satisfaction with the Provost’s response. “It’s recognition of service learning and the impact it has for students,” Feldberg said. The student executives emphasized that the sum does not come from student life fees and will not be used as part of CI’s programming budget.

The purpose of the fellowships will be the “funding of public service through CI,” as John Gardner, CC ’08, put it.

The board hopes to have a concrete application process for the additional funds as soon as possible.

Former Engineering Student Council President Dan Okin, SEAS ’07, and former Columbia College Student Council President Seth Flaxman, CC ’07, helped CI set up its first meeting with Brinkley last spring.

“Seth and I were really just talking and noticing that Community Impact was struggling as a governing board,” Okin said. “All Seth and I did was suggest to the provost that he meet with Community Impact.”

The proposals were reviewed over the summer, and the student executives were notified of their approval at the end of the summer.

“This goes to show that if you’re really thoughtful and present yourself professionally, people will listen,” Feldberg said. “This was our biggest success last year.”

Ivy Chen can be reached at ivy.chen@columbiaspectator.com.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 8)

Post a Comment

I think what's misleading is that the article fails to distinguish between CI's administrative budget and its student fees budget. Unlike other governing boards, CI has an entire administrative apparatus with funding that doesn't come from student life fees. If it's underfunded, that's separate from the individual service groups being underfunded.

Get the numbers right or Dan Wong will show up and someone gonna get a hurt real bad

This is a terrible article rife with inaccuracies. The "12% cut" in the allocation was primarily due to a $10,000 surplus in unspent allocation from the previous year, from a total budget of $80,000 from the councils. (Roughly 80k in 06-07 became roughly 70k in 07-08 because there was 10k left over. Yawn.) The $20,000 grant from the Provost's Office is worthy of being front-page news because this is actually a considerable increase in CI's budget.

I'm not sure where the "fourth of its $1 million budget from the University" comes from or how the organization is in any way in any sort of fiscal crisis.

Could you please do a follow up article where you actually explain these numbers or correct them?

Wait a sec. Doesn't 80000 to 70000 equal a 12% cut?
And as far as I can tell no one is saying anyone is particularly to blame, or that blame should be handed about. The fiscal crisis is what students have been saying for a year.

Oh, I see what you're saying now. In any case I think the quotes about a funding crisis came from before the allocations and spoke to a more general crisis.

Right, but the 10k difference was made up for by the surplus. So the total in 06-07 was 80k, and the total in 07-08 was also 80k (70+10), because CI didn't spend 10k that was given to them the previous year. So it's technically a cut in the allocation, but hardly qualifies as a crisis. F@CU granted CI essentially the exact same amount of allocation that was spent the year before.

I'm not suggesting anyone's to blame except the author of this article, who evidently didn't do due diligence.

Thanks for clarifying that the $20,000 was "in funds". I'm not sure what other form it might have taken, but now I don't need to worry about it.

Btw, saying that "Provost Alan Brinkley has given Community Impact $20,000 to be used for service learning fellowships for students" suggests that Brinkley personally donated the money. The rest of the article makes it reasonably clear that he actually awarded the program $20,000 of his office's budget, but the opening sentence should not have created this type of ambiguity.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots
-->