Barnard Confirms Abu El-Haj Will Likely Be Granted Tenure

PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 2, 2007

A statement released Friday by Barnard College confirmed professor Nadia Abu El-Haj has received tenure, after an e-mail sent by a departmental administrator first alerted the anthropology department listserv of the news.

The Barnard statement praised Abu El-Haj for passing the "extensive" review, and confirmed that the process is now nearing completion. "Nadia Abu El-Haj, a member of the Department of Anthropology, has been approved for tenure at Barnard College," the statement said. "The process will be procedurally complete after the decision has been presented to the boards of trustees at both Barnard and Columbia, but it is expected that Professor Abu El-Haj will earn the rank of Associate Professor."

The succinct Thursday e-mail provided little information and, until Friday's statement, Spectator was unable to independently confirm that the tenure offer had been made, as Abu El-Haj and Barnard College Communications did not return several calls and Columbia spokesman Robert Hornsby declined to comment.

“Here is the good news: Professor Nadia Abu El-Haj is now a tenured member of the Barnard and Columbia Anthropology Departments,” academic departmental administrator Xiomara Perez-Betances wrote in the e-mail.

Abu El-Haj has come under fire for her 2002 book, "Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society," in which she allegedly denies the existence of the ancient Jewish state of Israel. Though her bid for tenure drew criticism from a number of alumni and organizations like Campus Watch, a group that monitors Middle Eastern studies on college campuses, Abu El-Haj has also received strong support from colleagues within the department and beyond.

Lisa Hajjar, a professor at University of California, Santa Barbara who knew Abu El-Haj when the two were students at Hebrew University, wrote a letter to the editor of Spectator defending her.

“Contrary to one of the central allegations of her critics, Nadia Abu El-Haj does not claim that there was no Israelite historical presence in the land, as anyone who actually reads her award-winning book 'Facts on the Ground' would know,” she wrote.

Online petitions have been circulated both in support of and opposition to Abu El-Haj receiving tenure. Critics including Paula Stern, BC ’82 and author of the anti-tenure petition, accuse her of not citing sources appropriately, not having a thorough knowledge of Hebrew, and purposely mischaracterizing or ignoring parts of archaeological record. Supporters including Paul Manning, assistant professor of anthropology at Trent University in Canada, began a counterpetition stating that Stern’s assertions hailed from ethnic prejudice and, as the petition states, “an orchestrated witch-hunt (reminiscent of course of McCarthyism) against politically unpopular ideas.”

“At the time of the petition, I knew that Ms. Abu El-Haj had already been recommended for tenure, and indeed, had received it at Barnard, so it was a no-brainer to write a petition that argued on principle, that she should be given tenure,” Manning told Spectator in September.

Though some have criticized his opposition to Abu El-Haj because he is not an anthropologist, Alan Segal, the Ingeborg Rennert professor of Jewish studies at Barnard, has spoken at length against Abu El-Haj’s tenure. “The issue in a tenure scrutiny must be focused on the quality of the work,” he wrote in a submission to Spectator’s Opinion section in September. “My opinion comes after having read her dissertation and her book carefully, after having served for six years on Barnard’s ATP [Appointments, Tenure and Promotion] committee, and after having been a chair myself, charged with preparing cases in my department, as well as being professionally interested in the fields she needs to make her case. My judgment is ‘No.’”

Tom Faure contributed to this article.
Hayley Negrin can be reached at hayley.negrin@columbiaspectator.com.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 20)

Post a Comment

There's a good article about the controversy in the New Yorker; like most of us, I have not read El-Haj's book. But "hating Israel" doesn't seem to be an issue here.

That is it!!! the best the Palestinians have to show for academic acheivement in the last 500 years is an English professor who fabricated the truth in his autobiography!!! 500 years and that is all they havecontributed!!! Thatsays it all!!!

Congratulations. I am glad that common-sense prevailed, and people who know nothing about the merits of her work were not allowed to interfere with the Academic process. Good to see that the Zionist truth-distorting lobby isn't always invincible.

Can anyone at my alma mater name even one contribution the Palestinians have made to the world of science, medicine, art, or literature in the last 500 years????? P.S. exploding vests, shoes, and airplanes do not count.

Edward Said, you prick.

If you would only get out of their country, I'm sure they will trump Israel. Where would Israel be if it wasn't constantly blowing USA?

Congratulations to Nadia and Columbia University! She is a talented scholar and a wonderful person who was being judged by biased people based on her race and religion. It does Columbia credit that they saw past those people.

You should stop sniffing glue.

You should express your bitterness through other means Mr/Ms. Biased.

Why?

Have any of you clowns even read this book? My guess is not. Stop pretending you authoritatively know what she claims in the book until you've read it and not just Paula Stern's poorly conceived petition that even she admits incorrectly quotes El-Haj's book.

Why is this controversy so important? George Orwell tells us:

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

History is not just a dusty scholarly pursuit. History can be used to legitimize or deligitimize political situations. One way of deligitimizing the Israeli state is to falsify the historical connection that Jews have to Israel. Such reasoning accounts for the following statements: " The former mufti of Jerusalem, Ikrema Sabri, has made the claim that there never was a Jewish temple on the Temple Mount, and the Western Wall was really part of a mosque.
"There was never a Jewish temple on Al-Aksa [the mosque compound] and there is no proof that there was ever a temple," he told The Jerusalem Post via a translator. "Because Allah is fair, he would not agree to make Al-Aksa if there were a temple there for others beforehand."

The above quotation by the Ex-Mufti is from the following article in the Jerusalem Post:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/S...

This school is becoming such a joke. Granting tenure to somebody who can't even cite her sources? That shouldn't even pass for an undergraduate essay, let alone for a tenure appointment.

But who needs facts when you can hate Israel?

my postmodernism is just big boned.

She deserves her tenure. She's an incredible scholar and a wonderful professor.

Fortunately, common sense prevails against the pro-Israeli facists who deem themselves the arbiters of whom can write what in this nation. When the overwhelming majority of her peers in her department and in her field attest to the excellence of her scholarship and teaching, you know something is quite foul in the minds of the tiny and bothersome minority which is protesting the professor's success.

It's a travesty to even start this article with the word "controversial". That label is misleading and quite inappropiriate. Condoleeza Rice, Arlen Specter and Bill Gates all have enormous influence and arouse strong views pro and con among the public, yet none of them are labeled "controversial". It's an underhanded and insidious form of challenging the integrity and public image of this professor. Shame on you Spectator.

If Columbia (and academia in general) needs anything, it's less political correctness. And one of the last sacred cows which needs to be taken care of is the view that pro-Israeli sentiments and statements can go unchallenged and that anything that criticizes Israel in the slightest isn't worthy of consideration (indeed, it is viewed as worthy of only damnation).

That's why this tenure appointment (if true) is a victory on so many different levels. Here's to freedom of expression and academic integrity.

It's less politically correct to promote anti-jew I mean zionist ideas?

In what way is she not controversial? The Spectator didn't make her as much -- crazies on both sides of this debate did. Just because you don't think something it controversial doesn't mean it's not.

"Freedom of expression" except that Barnard alumnae and highly regarded historians and archaeologists arecalled "fascists" if they criticize a woman who has, after all, written that modern Jews have no connection with ancient Israel, that Israeli archaeologists use bulldozers to destroy Arab history, and that Jerusalem inthe time of Jesus was "not Jewish."

And what are we to make of a scholar who prublished papers on the genetiscs of the Jews where the word "diaspora" is alwars surrounded by "scare quote." Talk about underhanded and insidious.

All Columbia students should demand a refund of their tuition on the grounds that the university engaged in false advertising when they claimed that the school was a serious academic institution. Clearly a case of bait and switch. What's next? The hard sciences? "I put my hand on a rock, looked up at the sky and said "I am a physicist!" Yes, you are says President Bollinger.

Sad, if true. Sad, as a commentary on the decay into political trendiness and flabby postmodern "theory" of a once-vital discipline, cultural anthropology. Sad for Columbia, as its ability to detect and turn aside from sloppy, tendentious scholarship seems to have further decayed. Sad for the integrity scholarly life in America, where careerism and special pleading once more seem to have scored a triumph over intellectual responsibility. Sad for politics in general in that disciplinary vanity and institutional soft-headedness have once more provided the spin-doctors and talk show loudmouths of the Right with an easy target.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots