Questions, comments or a tip? Let us know.
Committee Favors 125th St. Rezoning With Amendments
Community Board 9 committee members voted to approve the Department of City Planning’s proposal to change the face of 125th Street at a public hearing Monday evening.
The board’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure committee voted 11 in favor, one opposed, with one abstention, and passed a resolution to amend the city’s rezoning proposal. Along with CB10 and CB11—whose districts would also be impacted by rezoning—the entire board will hold a final vote on Wednesday, as prescribed by ULURP bylaws. Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer will then have 30 days to submit his recommendation about the plan, taking into account the decisions of the community boards.
“I think it’s in our best interest to negotiate with city planning and to say yes with conditions. We’re actually winning and if we vote no, we’ll make it harder for ourselves,” CB9 member Savona Bailey McClain said. “We lost with Columbia a lot of what we want, and this is our chance to get something.”
CB9’s amendment resolution addressed the size of the rezoning coverage area, affordable housing, and building-height restrictions in the city’s plan.
A few months ago, the board “never entertained the comment that there would be luxury condominiums on 125th Street,” CB9 member Vicky Gholson, Ph.D. said. Now, there is a “prevailing attitude that there are certain things that are going to be pushed through regardless of what the community wants."
Citing the neighborhood’s responsibility to low-income families, CB9 called for the commission’s proposal to increase the required amount of affordable housing in new residential developments.
“Since the Harlem Renaissance, there has been another renaissance taking place,” said John-Martin Green, chair of the arts and culture committee on the West Harlem Local Development Corporation. “This one seems to be not driven by art and culture but by gentrification.”
The resolution calls for the commission’s rezoning plan to include the “New Amsterdam Special District,” which extends from the south side of 126th Street to 130th Street between Amsterdam and Morningside/Convent Avenue.
CB9 also requested that the city lower building-height requirements and increase efforts to cultivate consistent streetscape design throughout the 125th Street corridor.
Although board members discussed previous attempts to extend the rezoning area further west, all the way to the Hudson River, the board’s resolution did not include such provisions.
“At the end of the day, it’s a predestined plan and they’re going to do what they are going to do,” CB9 member Yvonne Stennett said.
In an effort to encourage the arts within the 125th Street corridor, the city’s proposal requires local business owners to allot floor space for arts-and-entertainment use, but CB9 expressed concern that this initiative only applies to Central Harlem. CB9’s resolution addressed this issue, asking that those provisions be expanded further west and modified to include space allocations for local businesses as well as arts programs.
“What we want is the benefits that they’re putting in the core [Central Harlem]. We want for the west,” Bailey-McClain said.
During the hearing, CB9 also approved further amendments to the resolution they had already prepared. These additions seek to ensure that new buildings along the 125th Street corridor would meet or exceed Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design “Silver” standards in accord with Mayor Bloomberg’s PlanNYC. In addition, the board entreatied the city to make a concerted effort in supporting female, minority, and disadvantaged business owners.
“We want to establish some sort of consensus, but we have to, in the end, do what is best for this district,” CB9 Chair Jordi Reyes-Montblanc said.
Samantha Saly can be reached at news@columbiaspectator.com.

















Beautiful work. You have done a splendid job of putting two and two together. A reader.
Things can only be pushed through when there is a lack of resistance. The West Side stadium, the stalled Atlantic Yards project and countless other examples prove that even mountains of money can not always overcome the will of the people.
I'd like to see how much wealth and prosperity there would be for the upper-class if all of these "lazy, shiftless losers" no longer did the under-paid, under-appreciated work that forms the basis of NYC's "service economy".
Hey, does Columbia pay taxes? Does its purchase of property and taking it off the tax rolls mean anything to you?
They are taking money right out of your pocket and all you can complain about is non-property owners.
You sound like a Core fool!
Columbia will be creating far more jobs in the area than currently exist. The net gain is obvious.
What people don't seem to realize is that all of these height restrictions that are being imposed in Manhattan ("downsizing" was recently approved for UWS and is also proposed for West Harlem) only increases rent. Limiting the supply of apartments while demand is as high as ever raises rents for everyone. Simple economics.
Now, there is a “prevailing attitude that there are certain things that are going to be pushed through regardless of what the community wants."
==================================================
Correct. Things are going to be pushed through that the PROPERTY OWNERS want. There is no "right" to "affordable housing"...affordable housing is nothing more than theft of taxpayer dollars to subsidize lazy, shiftless losers like the entire CB9 board and almost all communist Columbia students and professors.
You are incapable of taking care of yourself and wish to shoulder the burden on the taxpayers of this nation.
Just you wait until the tax-revolt happens.
Post new comment