On MTV, The Paper Beats Rock—Sort Of

PUBLISHED APRIL 14, 2008

Say what you will about MTV reality shows—call them trashy, exploitative, or amazing—and you’ll probably be right. One indisputable fact, though, is that MTV is incredibly adept at developing the reality villain. This is, after all, the network that gave us The Real World’s Puck and The Hills’ Heidi.

So when previews for The Paper began cropping up on MTV airtime, focusing largely on a girl named Amanda, there was no question as to which role she’d fill on the show. The promos capture her at her worst moments: singing loudly and inappropriately, glaring at others with that familiar ambitious gleam. Move over, Nickelodeon: there’s a new Amanda show in town.

The Paper is the true—inasmuch as any MTV reality show is “true”—story of a year with Cypress Bay High School’s award-winning newspaper, The Circuit. The first episode, which debuts tonight (fittingly in the timeslot after The Hills), follows several key juniors in their quest to become editor-in-chief. Amanda, of course, is one of those juniors, and in a cringe-inducing moment early in the episode, she gestures to the plaque on which each former editor’s name is engraved. “Every editor-in-chief’s name has started with an A,” she notes, going down the (admittedly short) list. “My name starts with an A.” Never mind that two of the other strongest contenders are named, um, Alex and Adam.

Alex, the current sports editor, is probably the most relatable cast member. Promo materials for the show tout him as Amanda’s friend, although footage shows him taking grudging part in the staff’s routine skewering of her. Adam, the current business manager, is melodramatic and, in his own way, just as grating as Amanda—but he has the advantage of position. He’s well-liked, so others take part in his Amanda hatefest to avoid being ostracized. The other frontrunner for the position, Giana, is the current clubs editor: a cute, petite girl who spends most of her time hanging off her boyfriend and fellow staff member, Trevor. She, like Alex, tries to stay civil with Amanda, but finds it difficult—she can’t permeate Amanda’s self-delusion, and soon decides to stop trying.

The show sets up a stark disconnect between Amanda and the rest of the cast early on—they all play beer pong at a weekend party she was apparently not invited to, while she works on her editor-in-chief application at home. She says something to the effect of how she’s glad she isn’t out partying and won’t have to worry about rushing her application, but something in the way she looks askance at her little white terrier suggests otherwise. This is a fundamentally lonely girl. Sure, she’s overbearing and annoying, but it’s obvious that it all stems from crippling self-consciousness and a terminally unfulfilled desire to be liked.

The show can, in fact, get tough to watch. There’s a scene late in the episode in which Amanda is doing her homework alone at the kitchen table. Her cell phone, which happens to be on the table and at which she happens to be staring, rings. The rest of the cast is out to dinner, and again, Amanda hasn’t been invited. They’re calling to “check up” on her—she’s been out with a sore throat—and to “wish her luck” on her application. But the rest of the cast make jokes under their breath (and, in Adam’s case, not under his breath at all), many of which she hears.

If this were fiction, it would be brilliant, but you can’t shake the knowledge that these are real people whose lives will, for better or worse, be altered by virtue of their having been on The Paper. We forgive MTV’s incessant depictions of Puck and Heidi as monsters, because they’re adults who knew what they were getting themselves into and also because each has his or her genuinely mean moments. The Cypress Bay kids, maybe, were a little too young to subject themselves to this­—and Amanda isn’t mean, she’s just annoying. It’s hard to imagine how she will react tonight if she watches the show. For what it’s worth, the playout of this universal disdain for one person is absurdly compelling, and I’ll be watching future episodes of The Paper—but not without a nagging sense of guilt.

TAGS: The Paper

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 26)

Post a Comment

As much as I support you for embracing the right of freedom of speech, you were totally owned by Amanda Lorber. If you went to Columbia, I'm sure you have better, more interesting things to write about that doesn't necessarily target a teenager who is so new to the public world. Cut her some slack, we're all annoying people and I'm sure you can find better things to write about.

not ALL of us are annoying, retard. and the show pertains to journalism in a public medium (tv), which for a somewhat dying industry, is a good thing, BUT when we see these drama kings and queens fight non-stop for half an hour, we miss what shoould have been the point of the show, THE PAPER (its the title for christs sake). so instead of defending the people, we should defend the medium at which they are representing (albeit very poorly) journalism and the printed word.

I think it's interesting that the writer chose to label Alex as the most relatable character--he writes for this very paper. I understand that reality television is very heavily edited, however a point worth making is that the views that were expressed by Alex in "The Paper" seem to have laid the foundation for the bias opinions in this very article. As for my opinion, I agree with Miss Lorber's reply to this article (she did get into a better school).

The funniest part of all of the comments is the fact that everyone decided to remain anonymous. I doubt Ms. Symonds actually knows who you are. I think many of the people who commented need to get a life and stop arguing about formatting. TV shows and the people on them are constantly being reviewed and criticized. I hope you all don't sit around your computers all day ready to start an argument with people whose reviews you disagree with. There are many other more important issues in the world today, use your AP style to help solve them.

I think you may need to write a follow-up considering your review is only based on the pilot. Previews can be misleading. Amanda Lorber is not the villian, more like the victim. I too thought she would be this arrogant , annoying, bitchy monster but it turns out she is just a victim of highschool bullying.

HAHAHA...funny stuff. Alexandria sucks, and she's ugly too!

need*

and later...
now should be not

Many of the people who've commented needed to calm down. Not only did Symonds have the right of free speech and press, she is only writing a critique of an MTV reality show. She did not write the article with malicious intentions but only to provide readers with an opinion. Our school has also written a column about "The Paper" because it's a reality show about the newspaper process, which happens to be exciting for journalism enthusiasts. And in a prior post, someone mentions how Alex wasn't a relatable character. If you had read the article carefully, Symonds wrote this article before the audience ever knew that Alex had a poor attitude. While some of her predictions were proven false, ultimately, her opinions were based on what she saw. While some of you may now agree with her views, calling Symonds a "bitch" or accusing her of harassing another writer is unfair. Yes her outlook took a slightly more negative connotation of Amanda, but Columbia has a great journalism program (the Pulitzer Prize is awarded in its journalism building every year) so Symonds most likely knows what she's doing.

relax everyone...its not that big of a deal.

why don't you find something better to write about. Your any better writing about MTV shows? Haha. You might as well work at a high school paper, no one cares about your sh**. Who the hell are you anyways?

you are 100 times more bitchy and ignorant that Amanda Lorber ever is. How did someone as ignorant as you ever get accepted into Columbia? you cant even get basic AP writing down. It's pretty pathetic that youre judging a high schooler in Florida, i think youre jealous and sad

Totally unrelated to the article itself, but people correcting your AP Style is annoying me.
Different papers use their own styles. They could do TV shows in quotes or in italics. Or *gaspshockhorror* both!
Get over it.

I think that if you spent such a significant amount of time writing about an intelligent editor in chief, you have no life. Sure, putting yourself out there into the public opens room for any kind of critique, but seriously? What has Amanda ever done to you? We only see (not even) 30 minutes of these ambitious journalists every week. There are things the show have not filmed that i'm sure you would have "approved."

Before you bag on someone you don't know, why don't you arrange some sort of introspection and find all the flaws in yourself.. I'm sure your list will be much longer than Amanda Lorber's

I think your article is very well written, so I support your stance on this ridiculous show.

Oh, and to a previous anonymous commenter, TV shows are not italicized--they are put between quotation marks.

Thanks, AP style!

I think your article is very well written, so I support your stance on this ridiculous show.

Oh, and to a previous anonymous commenter, TV shows are not italicized--they are put between quotation marks.

Thanks, AP style!

Oh, look at me! I'm Alexandria Symonds, a hard-hitting journalist who writes reviews for crappy MTV shows HOWEVER I use words like askance to try to legitimize myself as a good writer.

You're great.

Very well written article. I find it very humorous that Amanda sent you a hateful email. I suppose she does not understand that when one becomes a public figure he or she becomes open for criticism. Keep up the good work.

Wow.

I actually applied to this school?

And they actually accepted me?

No wonder.

Your article is the kind of article thats written by second rate journalists who try to elevate themselves by chastising and poking fun at easy targets. Shame on you Ms. Symonds. Enjoy your 15 seconds of fame gleamed by attacking fellow flash in the pan (though at least she received full 15 minutes of the limelight).

sock-puppeters should be extremely careful about proxies. and about not replicating the language in the Daily Intel email. jesus.

cutting through the fluff does not include passing judgements on a teenage girl based on one aspect of her life (which is all MTV shows for entertainment purposes) I think this show has helped propell Amanda's career by giving her exposure and opportunities that she might not have otherwise had. And to say that Alex was the most relatable i can see why you would write this article. He had a bad attitude the entire season and it showed more and more as the episodes progressed. Amanda was alone many of the times they filmed her because she chose to stay home and work on homework so that she could make something of herself, not because she is not well liked.

Thank you for telling it like it is Ms. Symonds! This article hardly comes across as bitter, terrible, judgmental, or delusional - If anything I'd have to say it's being a little too nice.

Anyone who is honestly offended by what was said in the article is also probably the type who gets offended when someone posts a mean bulletin about them on Myspace or Facebook. Get over it, people. You can't appear on an MTV reality show with THAT kind of personality, and expect to be treated like the princess you think you are. In any case, the comments in this article weren't even mean, which is why I'm in disbelief over how some people have responded.

As for anyone who wants to argue that this Amanda girl was portrayed in an unfavorable light through bad editing, then who exactly do you think you should be placing the blame on? The writer of this article for accurately commenting on what I'm sure many others (Including myself) also noticed, or the TV show for emphasizing a character's worst qualities?

Amanda isn't half as annoying as all of these judgments you've made about her.

Actually, show titles are italicized (thank you, AP style).

Don't listen to a word they say, Ms. Symonds. Someone has to cut through all the fluff that is an MTV 'reality' show and give the public a candid look at what this show really is. A ridiculous, vapid time-wasting chronicle of Amanda (who is ridiculous and vapid in her own respect).

Once again, great article! :)

You're all a bunch of dorks.

Anon commenter are trolls.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots
-->