Questions, comments or a tip? Let us know.
Student Claims Administrative Fears Led To Unwarranted Hospitalization
Instead of going out to dinner with his girlfriend as planned, Scott Massidda, SEAS ’11, spent Valentine’s Day at St. Luke’s Hospital, allegedly after University administrators deemed him dangerous. Since the event, Massidda—who believes school officials acted in an exaggerated reaction to the shootings at Northern Illinois University earlier that day—has been through a series of meetings pressing administrators to foot his hospital bill, admit wrongdoing, and release records documenting his psychological evaluation.
The issue of student mental health has taken on added urgency lately in the wake of school shootings such as the one that occurred at NIU, which led Massidda to speculate that he may have been the victim of overzealousness on the part of concerned administrators. On Feb. 14, campus officials sent out an e-mail at 12:46 p.m. urging faculty, staff, and administrators to be on the lookout for students exhibiting “unusual or disquieting behaviors.”
At 3 p.m., Massidda first drew administrators’ attention by, he said, “not making eye contact” and “pinching my wrists” during a disciplinary hearing with Morgan Levy, assistant dean of judicial affairs. Although Massidda said he didn’t recall pinching his wrists—which were already red from recent stitches—he admitted that he has a general problem with eye contact.
The hearing concerned charges that Massidda had stolen cereal from Hewitt Dining Hall. Massidda said that Levy spent most of the hearing “berating” him for not obeying Al Sorbera, who works in dining services at Barnard and demanded Massidda’s ID after seeing him take cereal from the cafeteria. A flier with Massidda’s photo is now posted at Hewitt, noting that he has been banned from the cafeteria since Feb. 6.
Around 7 p.m. on Feb. 14, Darleny Cepin, associate director of residential programs, apparently arrived at Massidda’s door. “I was sleeping, I had class at 7:10 p.m., and then Darleny came, saying, ‘I think you’re very stressed out, I think you should go to the hospital,’” Massidda said.
While Massidda said he regrets that he “didn’t really stand up for myself,” he complied with Cepin after she said that he had to go and that she was sent by Levy. He said that because Levy had just scolded him hours earlier for defying Sorbera, and because she controlled his disciplinary fate, Massidda said he didn’t want to aggravate his situation any further.
His friend Daniela Garcia, CC ’11, and his father, James Massidda, both said that when they spoke to Cepin, she told them Massidda went to St. Luke’s voluntarily.
“She said that if she hadn’t taken him, he would have gone anyway,” James said. “She lied to me.”
The father said he received a call from a St. Luke’s psychological evaluator around 9 p.m. as part of his son’s assessment.
“I called the hospital back, and I was pretty upset,” he said. “I asked them, ‘Why are you keeping him there? You got to let him go.’ ... But they said, ‘We can’t let Scott go, we’re told he’s dangerous, and he can’t go back to his dorm, so he’d just be released to the street.’”
The St. Luke’s employee told James that a Columbia official had to sign Massidda out because he would be a liability to the hospital otherwise. Cepin had already left and didn’t return to get him release until 9 a.m. the next day.
“I asked her, ‘What the hell happened?’” Scott Massidda said of the following morning. “She said I wasn’t in the right mental state and I was too stressed to remember anything.”
That day, Counseling and Psychological Services evaluator Allan Cassorla, who is also the associate director of health services, gave him a psychological evaluation.
“He determined early on that I was okay,” Massidda said. “He told me people were worried after the shooting [at NIU].”
In recent weeks, Massidda has requested copies of his file from Cassorla, but he said he was told that Cassorla hadn’t recorded their interview, raising concerns that there may be no record that Massidda “passed” his psychological assessment.
University policies outlined in “Facts About Columbia Essential To Students” don’t guarantee students access to records “that are created or maintained by a physician, psychologist, or other recognized professional or paraprofessional that are created, maintained, or used only in connection with the provision of treatment to the student,” which includes CPS.
Massidda and his father said the University has agreed to pay the $300 or so left on his hospital bill after his insurance covered part of it. He considered seeking compensation for his missed class and hockey practice, but dropped the effort after speaking to the Ombudsman’s office. He also met with Cristen Kromm, director of residential programs.
“The consensus between her and Cepin and Levy was just that it was bad luck,” Massidda said. “They thought no one was negligent, everyone just thought what they did was right. But I don’t agree with that. It was good to hear, but apologizing without admitting you made a mistake is kind of empty.”
He will meet with Dean Chris Colombo on Monday to go over the events leading up to and including his hospitalization.
Kromm, Cepin, and Levy all referred press requests to Eleanor Daugherty, associate dean of student affairs, who wrote in an e-mail that, “The Division of Student Affairs is unable to comment on issues relating to an individual student’s record. It is, however, in keeping with the practices and policies of the Division and the University to act in the best interest of the student’s well being.”
Cassorla also declined to comment on Massidda’s case for confidentiality reasons. But he said that if “someone is deemed potentially violent,” it would be a Public Safety issue, not a CPS issue, as there wouldn’t be time to do an evaluation.
“Sometimes, under some circumstances, a psychological evaluation is most prudent,” Cassorla said, “but that doesn’t happen very often.”
lien.hoang@columbiaspectator.com

















The article didn’t mention that the stitches on Scott’s wrist were a result of an injury he received while playing in the Columbia University hockey game Vs Yale. I was at that game. Also while at St Lukes Hospital he was subjected to several blood and urine tests and was confined overnight. I know because I have the hospital bill which was $1136 of which my health insurance paid $652. Columbia University overstepped their authority when they entered Scott’s room uninvited, woke him up, insisted he go the hospital and told the hospital staff that he was dangerous. The NYPD has the authority to do what Ms Cepin did but they would have provided a report explaining why it was necessary for them to suspend Scott’s civil rights which is what happens when you force someone to be drug tested and confined without their consent. When I was an EMT we had the authority to take someone to the hospital with a serious health problem even if they refused treatment. The one time it happened to me the run sheet was well documented and co-signed by a police officer. Columbia University has not provided any report and claim not to have one. A much more reasonable action for the University would have been to speak with Faculty who know Scott, his roommate and request that Scott speak with a University Crisis Counselor. Ms Cepin did apologize to me later.
Scott's Dad
It is interesting that students seem to think that administrators sometimes "go too far in these situations" until something happens like Virginia Tech or Columbine or (the list goes on) and then students are the first to say "administrators did not take us seriously when we said the kid was "weird". You can't have it both way folks...and you can't arm chair quarterback these situations. I know a hospital that released a student saying he was "no harm to himself", after a vountary admission. The student cut himself and ended up in a medical psych ward following his release. Every campus has students who act "weird" or are "strange". When they act out, cause behavioral problems or threaten themselves or others, the liablity falls on the institution to act first and ask questions later.
Are you kidding? Given a disciplinary hearing for "stealing" cereal from a dining hall? I was under the impression we paid a lot of money for the food in the dining halls.
So this guy admits he "has a problem with eye contact", has red wrists with stitches, and acts strange in a hearing.
No one is supposed to have him evaluated? Really?
Seems like he didn't do a very good job of presenting himself as "perfectly normal".
I have a friend who had a similar nightmarish experience, who was forcibly removed from her dorm room, restrained, and dragged away by Columbia security even after she'd stopped resisting, because she had been shouting or crying loudly. She was not hospitalized, but was forbidden to return to campus for several days. She never got any kind of compensation or apology. I've heard other stories like this at second hand.
Columbia is way more concerned about liability than its students. They don't mind so much if you commit suicide, as long as you do it off campus...
Post new comment