Former Manhattanville Holdout Sells to Columbia

PUBLISHED JUNE 11, 2008

Hudson Moving & Storage, a company at 3229 Broadway owned by Anne Whitman, came to an agreement with University officials to hand over her property within the Manhattanville expansion footprint, Columbia announced Wednesday.

The announcement comes after more than two years of arduous negotiations and numerous vocal cries of opposition from Whitman. Whitman agreed to give up her location between 129th and 130th Streets in exchange for a property to be newly constructed on Audubon Avenue in Washington Heights, near the Columbia University Medical Center.

In a statement, the University explained that it would pay for the cost of building the new structure, and would move the old facade on Whitman’s existing storage facility to the face of the building at Audubon Ave.

“We look at this as a win-win deal for both her and the University,” Columbia spokesperson Victoria Benitez said.

No design plans for the new storage facility have been finalized, and until Hudson’s new home construction is complete, the company will be temporarily housed in a building on the east side of Broadway between 131st and 132nd Streets. Benitez said there is no date set yet for the move into this temporary location, and the University is still negotiating details of timing and cost with Whitman.

As one of the final three holdouts keeping Columbia from complete control of its future Manhattanville campus site, Whitman had been loud and clear about her opposition to the University’s approach to expansion. During the city’s review process of Columbia’s plan, she spoke out on numerous occasions to demonstrate her frustration with the University and her determination to maintain a strong grasp on her property—which had been passed down through generations of her family.

At one early rally against Columbia’s plan, she said, “It's so ugly to see raw, naked greed,” and added later, “It's not good faith negotiation, it's bullying.”

Up until the agreement, she consistently stood alongside Tuck-It-Away Storage owner Nick Sprayregen—who has not yet struck a property agreement with Columbia—in railing against the University’s negotiation tactics. Sprayregen said he spoke with Whitman over the past few months about the negotiations process, and said that she “expressed extreme distress and extreme pressure” during these conversations.

“I give credit to Anne for holding out as long as she has,” said Sprayregen, who owns the desired properties at 3261 Broadway, 614 W. 131st St., and 655 W. 125th St. But he added that, “Everyone has their breaking points, and this obviously was hers.”

Still, according to Benitez, the property deal was struck with mutual contentment. Columbia’s statement explained that, as part of its Manhattanville campus, the University will “commemorate the building with plaques honoring the history of the building and Ms.Whitman's parents, Sheila Anne and Joseph Albert Zuhusky.”

Anne Whitman could not be reached to discuss the agreement. Columbia spokespeople in the past have declined to go into detailed discussions about negotiations and have encouraged businesses to do the same.

As Whitman stays silent, Columbia continues to move forward with expansion. Though two Manhattanville property owners—Sprayregen and the Singh family that runs the gas station on 129th Street—have yet to see eye to eye with the University, Columbia has vowed to pursue its vision as set forth in the plans approved by the city in December.

The expansion’s architecture is being designed to fill out the 17 acres comprised mainly of four blocks from 129th to 133rd streets between Broadway and 12th Avenue, along with property on the north side of 125th Street and east of Broadway from 131st to 134th streets.

Daniel Amzallag contributed to this article.

Article Tools:

View Comments ( 5)

Post a Comment

This looks like some good news for Columbia. I wouldn't worry about them taking over the world however. There is a Facilities blog columbiapowerhouse.blogspot.com and in this blog you can see commentary by employees who suspect facilities managers of taking kickbacks on contruction and repair bidding, as well as accusations that recently, managers locked Columbia into a silly expensive 3 year energy purchase agreement, rumors of under the table money are also discussed surrounding that . These are the same people who will not only be spending 4 plus BILLION of Columbia's money on the expansion, they will be running the new buildings after they exist. Some of the commentary on the blog is sophomoric and funny, but some of it smells like inside juice.

What a bunch of B.S. This woman just waited until the money was right and then moved. These people are the ones who are greedy, they are trying to extort sweetheart deals out of Columbia. I'm sick and tired of hearing them bitch and complain about how Columbia is taking advantage. And do we really need a plaque to commemorate this skank? Your family owned a moving and storage company? Wow, congratulations and thanks for your amazing contributions to society. Now go take a long walk off a short bridge.

I just hope the jerk who called this woman a skank would idenfity him/herself. This process of demeaning those who do not submit to power is just too damed Amerikan for me. The person is lacking in any form of civilized (potty?) training. Notice the use of the word "bitch" also. He/she is clearly a sicko sexist with a love of violence (falsely) representing him/herself as a member of humanity.

This behavior and demeanor make me think those who condemn Columbia for its takeover are really the only the voice of reason in this debate.

She has every right to negotiate the best deal possible. And Columbia is no different. Columbia is motivated by self interest as well.

I am also "sick and tired" of hearing all this sanctimonious, altruistic crap about how much Columbia does for Harlem.

Nicely said. I thought plaques were reserved for those who actually accomplished something? Furthermore, why spend millions of dollars moving the building's facade. The last time I checked, the facade looked like a dump with its tacky paint job. A better alternative would be to set up a financial aid fund in the name of the moving company or the family's name.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Allowed HTML tags: <!--pagebreak--><p><br><i><b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><!--pagebreak-->
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Security question, designed to stop automated spam bots
-->