Frontiers of Science

The poetry of mathematics

Columbia needs to emphasize the power and beauty of math.

A scientific Core

Sometimes students have to be forced to learn what's best for them.

Refining the pursuit

Explaining the changing rationale behind the science requirement.

Measurable adjustments

The Core's science requirement needs to be rethought quantitatively.

Reflections on Frontiers of Science

Frontiers of Science allows all of us to critically evaluate science, allowing us to question the experts.

Pushing the Frontiers

Frontiers of Science deserves to be appreciated as an essential part of the Core Curriculum.

Helfand taking leave from Columbia to lead start-up university

“I gradually sort of got sucked into this concept of starting a university from scratch, which was really designed for students and problems of the 21st century, rather than the 19th century,” Helfand said.

The failure of Frontiers

Though a good idea in theory, Frontiers of Science still faces practical shortcomings.

Frontiers of philosophy

“Even professional scientists,” Albert Einstein remarked, “seem to me like somebody who has seen thousands of trees but has never seen a forest.” When he said this in 1944, he was referring to a type of “independence created by philosophical insight” that scientists should consider diving into more often. It’s also been a wonder to me why academic institutions, including Columbia, separate the sciences from philosophy as strictly distinct disciplines, when both sides could actually grow more intellectually by communicating and overlapping a little more.

Frontiers of Science up for evaluation, renewal

The University continues to experiment with Frontiers of Science.