
BY Stuart Beal November 18 In “The Everyday Life of Design,” Alan Gilbert, an adjunct associate professor in Columbia’s Master of Fine Arts writing program, suggests poetry is arson: “But I’m not an arborist, / just an ardorist and maybe an arsonist / if that’s what you call poetry.” He writes that “poetry is a bird acting wounded / in order to draw predators away from its young.” There’s truth in both: poetry as flame, as the act of setting aflame, as spectacular violence; poetry as performance, as defense, as sacrifice for the weak. But where do these constructs of poetry leave the poet? Is the poet the arsonist or the burning building? Is the poet the bird, the young, or the predator?